The Borough Park Vote and The Politics of Playing the Game

Gatemouth of Room 8 in a comment to OTBKB complains that I am  extremely naive—even delusional—about the Lander Der Blatt ad.

He suggests that it was actually a member of Lander's campaign, who placed the ad in Der Blatt as part of the effort to win votes in Borough Park, a community of conservative Hasidic Jews of the Satmar sect.

Okay, I am taking my rose colored glasses off, Gatemouth. You and others are saying that Lander tacitly allowed the ad by looking the other way when a campaign member by the name of Fleisher (with strong ties in Borough Park) placed the anti-gay ad in Der Blatt???

Omigod!

Sure, Lander is running hard for the votes in conservative Borough Park, as is John Heyer, who is against same sex marriage and abortion. Clearly, Heyer's conservative social views are more in line with Borough Park's Jewish community.

But Brad Lander is a liberal who openly supports gay marriage and abortion. His views on Israel are progressive. He is a member of Kolot Chayenu, a Jewish congregation in Park Slope, with openly progressive views about Israeli politics. Here's what it says on their website:

"We are creative, serious seekers who
pray joyfully, wrestle with tradition, pursue justice and refuse to be
satisfied with the world as it is. As individuals of varying sexual
orientations, gender identities, races, family arrangements, and Jewish
identities and backgrounds, we share a commitment to the search for
meaningful expressions of our Judaism in today's uncertain world."

Ellen Lippmann, the rabbi at Kolot Chayenu, is a lesbian for Chrissakes.  

So why would Brad Lander look the other way? Is he that desperate for votes? I guess that's possible.

 Is it that he has learned to play the game required to win votes in Borough Park? Also possible.

According to Gatemouth, the answer is yes:

"This was not the work of another campaign; as was reported in City Hall News, Lander's Borough Park guy went to Der Blatt with a picture supplied by Lander and asked for an ad similar to the homophobic crap Heyer had run; he got it."

So, can you ever trust politicians?

I was hoping so. Back in the spring of the City Council race, I was impressed with this intelligent—and principled—group of individuals, who had decided to run for Bill di Blasio's seat. I now understand that what it takes to win a political race in NYC (and probably everywhere) requires a lot of "playing the game."

Indeed, functioning in the NYC City Council also requires playing the game. Sadly, from what I've learned, life in the City Council is largely about slush funds, pandering to the council speaker, and scratching the backs of the powerful.

I suspect that what it takes to win a race is similar to what it takes to succeed in the City Council. That's why it's important to vote for someone who at least works hard to stay above the toxic and sometimes corrupt frey of NYC politics.

Okay. Rose colored glasses off, I am mulling over what this all means. Here's my question. If you are a politician: How do you run for office without playing the game? Is this sort of thing endemic to being a politician? As citizens, are we, too, supposed to look the other way as our candidates—and politicians—look the other way.

I hope not.

While Gatemouth says that it is unlikely that  Lander personally authorized or had knowledge of of the contents of the ad, he does say this:

"It is virtually certain that Fleisher authorized the paper to print an ad of the substance of the one which appeared. As I noted, Fleisher virtually admitted this to City Hall News."

If any of this is true, I agree with Gatemouth that  Lander must publicly dismiss Fleisher from his campaign ASAP, "using the strongest possible terms, or be held accountable for what appeared."

If none of this is true, that Lander has no idea who placed the ad in Der Blatt, I rescind my charge that even a smart, right-thinking candidate looked the other way when a member of his campaign "played the game."

Which of the candidates running for City Council in the 39th is least likely to play the game? It might not be considered smart politics but it is the higher road to take in a city rife with compromising political thoroughfares. 

One thought on “The Borough Park Vote and The Politics of Playing the Game”

  1. Hi Louise,
    Thanks for these pieces. I was not up on this issue. I heard Brad Lander speak at a forum early this year on the “vanishing” city and how we can reclaim it and I wasn’t very impressed. Too slick and made too many excuses for why developers got so many breaks under 421(a) – I believe? – for so many years – trying to make it sound like it was all over (and of course he was instrumental in changing that, according to him). Was so politician-like, it was eerie. All the other speakers were so genuine and on the up-and-up (but, no, they were not politicians…). And if City Council Speaker Christine Quinn is writing letters on his behalf, then I would say that he will just be your typical politician in the City Council and should not be endorsed or voted for.
    FYI, the link to Gatemouth/Room 8 doesn’t link and in your previous piece the link to Room 8 and Huffington Post are off too.
    Take care. Love the Rocky Sullivan’s endorsements!

Comments are closed.