<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BROOKLYN PAPERS APOLOGIZES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlytheblogknowsbrooklyn.com/2006/10/13/brooklyn-papers-apologizes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlytheblogknowsbrooklyn.com/2006/10/13/brooklyn-papers-apologizes/</link>
	<description>Serving Park Slope and Beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:17:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dalton</title>
		<link>http://onlytheblogknowsbrooklyn.com/2006/10/13/brooklyn-papers-apologizes/comment-page-1/#comment-5512</link>
		<dc:creator>dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlytheblogknowsbrooklyn.addresszero.com/?p=8272#comment-5512</guid>
		<description>I think the uproar over this is completely ridiculous.  People can be really silly sometimes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the uproar over this is completely ridiculous.  People can be really silly sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mamainwaiting</title>
		<link>http://onlytheblogknowsbrooklyn.com/2006/10/13/brooklyn-papers-apologizes/comment-page-1/#comment-5511</link>
		<dc:creator>mamainwaiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlytheblogknowsbrooklyn.addresszero.com/?p=8272#comment-5511</guid>
		<description>Yes, I noticed the cover, and thought it was a cheap shot - and very  inappropriate.  I mean talk about being opportunistic -  I guess that dumb editor can really be dumb
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I noticed the cover, and thought it was a cheap shot &#8211; and very  inappropriate.  I mean talk about being opportunistic &#8211;  I guess that dumb editor can really be dumb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patronzo</title>
		<link>http://onlytheblogknowsbrooklyn.com/2006/10/13/brooklyn-papers-apologizes/comment-page-1/#comment-5510</link>
		<dc:creator>patronzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 02:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlytheblogknowsbrooklyn.addresszero.com/?p=8272#comment-5510</guid>
		<description>what a flippant, shallow response to a corporate insult to our neighborhood, and how ditzy it makes you seem to be (&quot;a photo from a movie.  how cool&quot;). have you always been an apologist for your paymasters?  the brooklyn papers should have been more contrite, and should have apologized directly to everyone who was forced to look at its front page, and, specifically, to the object of its misogynistic, immature attack.  for a newspaper to mumble &#039;i&#039;m sorry&#039; the way it did on its web site speaks volumes about its lack of professionalism.  your enthusiastic &#039;fiddle dee dee&#039; attitude also comes across loud and clear.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a flippant, shallow response to a corporate insult to our neighborhood, and how ditzy it makes you seem to be (&#8220;a photo from a movie.  how cool&#8221;). have you always been an apologist for your paymasters?  the brooklyn papers should have been more contrite, and should have apologized directly to everyone who was forced to look at its front page, and, specifically, to the object of its misogynistic, immature attack.  for a newspaper to mumble &#8216;i&#8217;m sorry&#8217; the way it did on its web site speaks volumes about its lack of professionalism.  your enthusiastic &#8216;fiddle dee dee&#8217; attitude also comes across loud and clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

